Research Process Rubric - Elementary Karen Franker's rubric to assess planning, gathering, organizing and citing information in grades Holistic Critical Thinking Rubric pdf Critical thinking and skills used to problem solve.
Rubric for Research Process Joyce Valenza's rubric assesses 5 research performance areas for high school students. Research Process Reflection Joyce Valenza's Question Brainstormer encourages students to ask focus questions and reflect on the research process.
Information Summary Rubric High school or college level. Writing Projects Includes rubrics for essay questions, logs, journal writing, and lab write-ups. Research Paper Rubric Word doc. Rubric for Scoring Effective Writing Word doc. Persuasive Essay Rubric Word doc Mr. History and Government class rubric: Rubrics for Middle School Includes invention report, book talk, persuasive essay and autobiographical event essay. Math Rubrics 4 levels of math understanding with performance criteria.
Science Rubric pdf Performance criteria for use of scientific tools, science reasoning and strategies, science concepts and use of data and communication. Physics Project Rubric A good example of a performance rubric tuned a specific project. Easy to adapt to other subjects. Kindergarten Rubrics Assess literacy development. Kindergarten Rubrics Evaluates communication, fine muscle development, emergent reading and writing, large muscle development, math development, creative arts, personal development and work habits, play and social skills.
Third Grade Venn Diagram Rubric. Author's writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources. For the most part, ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow - disjointedness is apparent. Author's writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.
Does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationships. More than 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources.
Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative. All web sites utilized are credible. When assignments are scored and returned with the rubric, students can more easily recognize the strengths and weaknesses of their work and direct their efforts accordingly.
Here are links to a diverse set of rubrics designed by Carnegie Mellon faculty and faculty at other institutions. Although your particular field of study and type of assessment activity may not be represented currently, viewing a rubric that is designed for a similar activity may provide you with ideas on how to divide your task into components and how to describe the varying levels of mastery.
Grading and Performance Rubrics What are Rubrics? Advantages of Using Rubrics Using a rubric provides several advantages to both instructors and students. Examples of Rubrics Here are links to a diverse set of rubrics designed by Carnegie Mellon faculty and faculty at other institutions.
Paper Assignments Example 1: Anthropology Writing Assignments This rubric was designed for a series of short writing assignments in anthropology, CMU. This rubric was designed for essays and research papers in history, CMU. Capstone Project in Design This rubric describes the components and standard of performance from the research phase to the final presentation for a senior capstone project in the School of Design, CMU.
Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’ s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished -no errors.
Characteristics to note in the rubric: Language is descriptive, not evaluative. Labels for degrees of success are descriptive (“Expert” “Proficient”, etc.); by avoiding the use of letters representing grades or numbers representing points, there is no implied contract that qualities of the paper will “add up” to a specified score or grade or that all dimensions are of equal grading.
Research Paper Rubric Name: _____ Date: _____ Score: _____ Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard No Evidence Score Title Page Title Your Name, Teacher’s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no errors Evidence of four Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less Absent. Research Paper Grading Rubric Name: Course: Date: (The Psychology Department at San José State University is acknowledged for the basic structure of this form.) CATEGORY Unacceptable (Below Standards) Acceptable (Meets Standards) Good (Occasionally .
The organization, elements of research report/paper writing, grammar, usage, mechanics, and spelling of a written piece are scored in this rubric. Research Paper Rubric (A) (B) (C) (D) (F) Thesis clearly stated and appropriately focused clearly stated but focus could have been sharper thesis phrasing too simple.