Her situation is untenable, as she can never become a part of the class she longs to join, but neither can she accept her own position. By accepting an invitation to interact on a temporary basis with the members of the upper class, Mathilde complies with their requirements.
Not only do these requirements effectively force the Loisels to retain their lower social status, but they also cause a further loss of income by requiring Monsieur Loisel to spend money he cannot afford to dress Mathilde as she desires. Because women cannot work for success, they must depend upon the confines of marriage to advance their social standing, as Madame Forestier does. Women succeed in this society only as fashion objects.
A crucial symbol for feminist critics is the mirror in which Mathilde admires herself, which represents objectification. Deconstructionist critics might focus on the binary opposition between wealth and poverty, discussing how in this instance poverty is the preferred condition, because through poverty Mathilde sees that she was not poor in her previous circumstance. Had she stopped to think, Mme. Loisel may have realized that there was some risk in borrowing a necklace that she thought was so expensive.
Also, the impression she makes at the ball would not likely have much bearing on her life later on. Her refusal to wear natural roses shows us that one of her worst fears is to appear poor. Thus to prevent injury to her pride she makes a gamble in which winning will bring little, and losing, although the chance of such is overlooked, has drastic consequences.
Loisel's pride causes her to make another error after she loses the necklace. To buy time she lies to Mme. Forestier, telling that the necklace is being mended. Loisel ultimately cannot recover the necklace she and her husband go into debt and buy a new one, worrying that Mme. Forestier would "have taken Mme. Loisel for a thief" The obvious decision is for Loisel to tell Forestier the truth.
Forestier would then have been able to tell her that the necklace was a fake. Loisel does not know this, but even so Mme. Forestier would not likely take her old school friend for a thief. Indeed, it is possible that she may have agreed to pay a portion of the debt, or give Loisel board as a servant. Loisel commits herself to ten years of drudgery to avoid having an old friend, whom she doesn't much care for, call her a thief.
Loisel takes on the debt to bolster her pride, the same pride which puts her into her dilemma, and refuses to let her out. Despite the fulfillment of her greatest dreams and the vanities of her pride, this is reduced to nothing as she and her husband must now struggle to find and buy diamonds to replace the lost necklace.
The final irony occurs ten years later, after Madame Loisel and her husband have worked themselves to the bone to repay the debt incurred by the loss. She runs into her friend who lent her the diamond necklace for the party.
Her friend refuses to speak with her, thinking she is a common woman, worn and rugged. Her friend is astounded, but not nearly as astounded as Madame Loisel is about to be. But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs!
From the time of her marriage, through her blossoming years, Madame Loisel desires what she does not have and dreams that her life should be other than it is. It is only after ten years of hard labor and abject poverty that she realizes the mistake pride led her to make.
- Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace" During the course of Guy de Maupassant's short story "The Necklace," the main character, Matilda Loisel, makes a number of ironic discoveries. In addition, there are other discoveries that the reader makes but Matilda does not.
The story The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant is a biting criticism of vanity. It follows the life and hopes of Madame Loisel who dreams of being bedecked with jewels and fine dresses. Her pride causes her constant discomfort in life. Highlighting the disappointments in Madame Loisel’s life, de Maupassant creates a bitter picture of a life wasted.
In Guy de Maupassant's "The Necklace" Mathilde Loisel, a middle-class housewife, fantasizes about leading a life of wealth. Mme. Loisel is a proud woman. Following his service in the Franco-Prussian War of , Guy de Maupassant studied with the seminal French writer Gustave Flaubert. From Flaubert, de Maupassant learned that his job as a writer was to observe and then report common occurrences in an original way.
“The Necklace ” by Guy de Maupassant is a story of greed and envy and how these two characteristics lead to a substandard life and Words | 3 Pages Superficiality Vs/5(1). The Necklace Essay Examples. 88 total results. An Analysis of the Character Mathilde Loisel in The Necklace, a Novel by Guy de Maupassant. words. A Comparison of Two Different yet Alike Women in the Necklace by Guy De Maupassant and A Story of an Hour by Kate Chopin. 1, words. 2 pages. An Analysis of Guy de Maupassant's Story "The.