My kingdom for a good plagiarism checker! Accurate checks at a reasonable price — is this possible? It is, if you aim at creating a product that meets the needs of a variety of users, not just the ones with a considerable budget and lots of documents to scan for plagiarism on a regular basis.
That's why an innovative Noplag online service was created with maximum effectiveness in mind, based on advanced algorithms of checking your texts against the Internet, public repositories and Noplag extensive database of academic papers. It is very fast, as compared to other plagiarism scanners, and provides a detailed plagiarism report that you can send and share. So don't let plagiarism issues slow you down any more, deal with them in the fastest and most effective way that modern technology provides!
Everything that has once been problematic about plagiarism or its detection can be easily avoided today. Many people continue to carelessly think that plagiarism may be a problem, but it's not THEIR problem.
We can agree, but this definition is missing one main component: If you are using a reliable, efficient and accurate service such as Noplag to check for plagiarism , and it provides fast, detailed, easy-to-interpret results, you can rest assured that plagiarism is not your problem. Insert your text here Then press "Start Checking".
Please enter more text to start checking: There are enough words entered. Professional plagiarism report for individual use! Noplag products for everyone Add your websites url. Authors are obliged to follow ethical, moral, and legal regulations acceptable by the scientific community 2 , 9. To do so, they must properly cite relevant publications and quote borrowed published or unpublished ideas and words 2 , 9 , The reader should be clearly informed over what is original and recycled from other sources 2 , 9 , 14 , Current academic promotion and research funding are heavily dependent on the quantity of articles.
It is absolutely unacceptable to republish a paper with minor changes, without referring to the primary publication, and to present it to the readership as a new source. In this case, the author may breach the copyrights of the publisher, holding all rights for distribution and republication of the primary source. The same applies not only to the verbatim copying of the text, but also to the borrowing of published tables, figures, and other graphical material, even those of the same author.
It is also unacceptable to excessively rely on multiple published papers, even if these are properly paraphrased or summarized in a secondary publication review, editorial. The readership deserves to find new points, ideas and original texts in each and every scholarly paper This is why some leading publishers set limits of references for different types of papers. In accordance with the principles of GSP and Good Laboratory Practice GLP , scientific and academic institutions should have units for monitoring research and development of the quality.
The institutions should set policies and take responsibility for integrity of research reporting. This is particularly important for boosting potential of novice researchers. The adherence to the codes of GSP, in turn, ensures the quality of education 16 , 17 , 18 , Reliable and evidence-based sources are increasingly extrapolating into medical practice guidelines, influencing human health. Accordingly, scientific misconduct may have farreaching detrimental consequences. Historically, first attempts to tackle scientific misconduct and dishonesty were made in the U.
Based on the US model, many national bodies for ethics in science were established globally. As a result, science editors became familiar with multiple cases scientific dishonesty.
COPE introduced scientific principles of fairness and developed a set of flowcharts specifically dealing with misconduct. To have trustworthy results and to avoid misconduct, researchers should use optimal study designs and follow ethical standards. Scientific misconduct can be unintentional and intentional. The former is usually due to inappropriate use of research methodology, while the latter is a frank dishonesty and violation of ethical standards intellectual dishonesty.
Misconduct can take the form of legal violations. Inappropriate authorship and research manipulations can be viewed as serious ethical and legal violations, subject to punishments of respective scientific and academic institutions 1 , 3 , 17 , 18 , The worst forms of scientific misconduct and intellectual dishonesty are:. The term plagiarism stems from the Latin word plagium , meaning kidnapping a man.
Plagiarism of words and ideas can be unintentional and intentional As Miguel Roig from St. In all its forms, as Elsevier publisher edited, plagiarism constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable Plagiarism dates back to the foundation of science communication as a discipline.
According to the World Association of Medical Editors WAME strict definition, plagiarism is when six consecutive words are copied 6 , 25 , 7 to 11 words are overlapping set of 30 letters Here we are reminded of the comment of Samuel Johnson, dealing with a manuscript that he sent for evaluation: Plagiarism of words can be divided into: Unfortunately, digitalization made copy-paste plagiarism and inappropriate re-use of sources from the websites, online journals, and other electronic media widespread.
There are no universal regulations on plagiarism prevention suitable for all scientific and academic institutions 1. COPE attempted to tackle the problem of plagiarism by recommending cooperation with research institutions and retraction of untrustworthy material Since then, ORI has reported a constant rise of cases of misconduct and plagiarism If plagiarism is surfaced after the publication, editors should retract the paper and inform the readership on misconduct 1.
The respective COPE flowchart is helpful in this regard. Ethical aspect of publishing is especially important for small and developing economies The participation of scientists from Bosnia and Herzegovina in the global scientific communication entails the obligation of accepting international standards cite the sources used 9. Th is will allow avoiding accusations of self-plagiarism. It is possible to republish the data previously presented in the form of congress abstract, with a reference to the abstract.
Copyright Assignement Form dowloaded from www. Cases of plagiarism have been known throughout history of mankind. It affected not only medicine, but many other disciplines. Perhaps the first reported cases of intellectual dishonesty are those from the U.
In , colleagues and supervisors discovered fabrication of the published data, mostly from the years of studentship at Emory and Harvard Universities. More than 10 primary publications and 45 abstracts were retracted as a result of the investigation Robert Slutsky worked as a radiologist in University of California. An investigation found that of its 77 publications were valid, 48 were questionable, and 12 were false 8 , In our times, plagiarism reported even among politicians and state leaders, who plagiarized during the PhD writing.
Also, this plague affected many doctorate and master theses, and regular articles in Bosnia and Herzegovina and some other countries of South Europe.
An analysis of submissions to the Croatian Medical Journal revealed 28 cases of scientific misconduct Ten cases were related to duplicate publication of the same results in different journals, eight cases of multiple submissions, and five cases of plagiarism 18 , Interestingly, the first case of plagiarism in Croatia referred to one of the most productive Croatian scientists, who was accused for misconduct in a paper published 40 years ago.
An investigation substantiated the case of plagiarism by a Croatian and a British researchers, who published their work in Acta Medica Iugoslavica. The case was closed after an apology from the Croatian author, who continued producing a large number of quality papers and became one of most cited author in his scientific field. In another notorious case from Croatia, a group of undergraduate students reported that 86 pages of an American textbook were translated into Croatian and published without acknowledging primary textbook.
An investigation confirmed that the accusations of plagiarism were correct. In the former Yugoslav countries, number of plagiarism cases in textbooks, articles, monographs, scientific and professional articles is increasing. To their more intense detection helped database browser and some specially designed software for these purposes. The key reasons for the intense plagiarism is, how Serbian scientists mentioned in blogs on web sites, the lack of basic medical research, which are absent because less money is allocated for the research But, also one of the key reasons is the newly introduced Bologna principle of studies that needs many experts to be involved in the teaching process and which significantly changed the selection criteria for teachers in teaching and academic titles.
Scientists in Serbia and Croatia with petitions stood up in defense of academic dignity against those who plagiarize in their papers the other authors. And I am also among those who are copied. In the former Yugoslavia before the war in the Balkans there were indexed journals.
I think that this is a serious problem that should be addressed in the international academic community, because it is not only a question of credibility disrupted scientists from former Yugoslav countries, but also journals and indexing databases which stores plagiarized articles.
This problem is difficult to solve because a large number of plagiarism has done with people involved in political decisionmaking in these countries. Letter to Editor-in-Chief of Medical Archives regarding plagiarism in published article. Academic plagiarism is more easily detected by the software as Turnitin and SafeAssign and scientific plagiarism with CrossCheck and eTBlast software. The software consists of algorithms to detect similarities, associated databases and web sites by which it compares the article.
This software packages helps to identify plagiarism but they also have flaws and still needs improvements Honesty in science is the very basis of its existence. Even a shadow of dishonesty may devalue the work and lead to the loss of respect 29 , 30 , 33 , Scientific and academic institutions should have established units for monitoring, promotion and research development.
Science should not be exempt from disclosures and sanctions due to plagiarism.
Google Scholar and Google Books has a large databases of past and current published materials, studies and articles that makes the software more accurate in tracking down duplicate content. Always make sure that your essay is not containing plagiarism before final submission to obidytfp.cfon: Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, WC2H 9JQ, UK.
Our journal (Journal of Mountain Science) will first check the plagiarism of a manuscript by using ITHENTICATE after it is submitted. This crosschecking system will compare the similarity of the present paper with the millions of papers previously published and articles in the internet (usually by google), and provide a separate similarity index with one .
If there is plagiarism, TurnItIn will identify it. Editors of some scientific journals now use a program called Cross Check powered by obidytfp.cf Steven Shafer is the editor of the research journal Anesthesia & Analgesia. Plagiarism Checker for research Papers. We can’t check the plagiarism for research papers with any Plagiarism checker. Best plagiarism checker for research paper are according to the Journal in which we are going to publish our research paper. Best is reach out the Journal in which you are planning to publish your research paper.
Plagiarism detection The peer-review process is at the heart of scientific publishing. As part of Elsevier's commitment to protecting the integrity of the scholarly record, Elsevier feels a strong obligation to support the scientific community in all aspects of research and publishing ethics. Sep 15, · Scientific publishing is the ultimate product of scientist work. Number of publications and their quoting are measures of scientist success while unpublished researches are invisible to the scientific community, and as such nonexistent.