Skip Nav

Writing Death Penalty Research Papers

Research Paper on Death Penalty

❶Had any of these punishments survived the eighteenth century, there is little doubted that public reaction would have forced an end to capital punishment long ago Isenberg

Client testimonials

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay
Past Months
41 comments

Currently, there are thirty-three states in which the death penalty is legal and seventeen states that have abolished it Death Penalty Information Center. I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation. There are many reasons as to why I believe the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence, retribution, and morality; and because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will refute the ideas that the death penalty is unconstitutional, irrevocable mistakes are made, and that there is a disproportionality of race and income level.

The use of capital punishment greatly deters citizens from committing crimes such as murder. Ernest van den Haag, a professor at Fordham University, wrote about the issue of deterrence:. They fear most death deliberately inflicted by law and scheduled by the courts….

Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred. And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence.

This was due to other possible murderers being deterred from committing murder after realizing thatother criminals are executed for their crimes.

Capital punishment also acts as a deterrent for recidivism the rate at which previously convicted criminals return to committing crimes after being released ; if the criminal is executed he has no opportunity to commit crimes again. Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty. The reason some evidence may be inconclusive is that the death penalty often takes a while to be carried out; some prisoners sit on death row for years before being executed.

This can influence the effectiveness of deterrence because punishments that are carried out swiftly are better examples to others. Although the death penalty is already effective at deterring possible criminals, it would be even more effective if the legal process were carried out more quickly instead of having inmates on death row for years.

The death penalty also carries out retribution justly. When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take away lives, peace, and liberties from society. Giving the death penalty as a punishment simply restores order to society and adequately punishes the criminal for his wrongdoing. Retribution also serves justice for murder victims and their families.

This lack of malice is proven in the simple definition of retribution: The death penalty puts the scales of justice back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal. The morality of the death penalty has been hotly debated for many years.

Those opposed to the death penalty say that it is immoral for the government to take the life of a citizen under any circumstance. It is immoral to not properly punish a person who has committed such a horrendous crime.

The criminal is also executed humanely; in no way is he subjected to torture or any form of cruelty. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US. Inmates are first given a large dose of an anesthetic so they do not feel any pain Bosner ; this proves that the process is made as humane as possible so the inmates do not physically suffer.

Although the issue of morality is very personal for many people, it is important to see the facts and realize that capital punishment does take morality into account and therefore is carried out in the best way possible.

The eighth amendment to the United States Constitution prevents cruel and unusual punishment. Many opponents of capital punishment say that execution is cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violates the Constitution. As was stated earlier, the recipient of the death penalty is treated humanely and is not tortured in any way, shape, or form.

After the anesthetic is administered the person feels no pain; the only part of the process that could be considered painful is when the IV is inserted, but that is done in hospitals on a daily basis and no one is calling it unconstitutional.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the death penalty as constitutional in cases they have presided over. In the case of Furman v. The Supreme Court has not found capital punishment to be unconstitutional, and therefore this argument for abolition is invalid.

Another argument put forth by death penalty abolitionists is the possibility of executing an innocent person. Many people that argue this overestimate how often this happens, it is an extremely rare occurrence and has not happened since the death penalty was reintroduced in Mistakes will be made in any system which relies upon human testimony for proof.

We should be vigilant to uncover and avoid such mistakes. Our system of justice rightfully demands a higher standard for death penalty cases. Stewart points out that death penalty cases are held to a much higher standard. Due process in these cases takes much longer so that the court can be absolutely sure that the person is guilty before sentencing him to execution.

This helps to eliminate any errors that could lead to executing the wrong person. He also points out that although there is a small possibility for mistakes to be made, this does not mean capital punishment should be abolished.

If everything that had the potential for harmful mistakes were outlawed, society would be extremely crippled. It is true that there is disproportionality when it comes to the races and classes that most frequently receive the death penalty.

It has been proven that minorities and those with lower income levels are overrepresented on death row. This is not due to discrimination; this is due to the higher rate at which these groups commit crime ProCon. It has been argued that poverty breeds criminality; if this is true then it makes sense that those at a lower income level would more frequently be sentenced to execution than those at higher income levels ProCon.

It has also been proven that minorities are disproportionately poor, and therefore they would also be more likely to receive the death penalty.

Ernest van den Haag said it best:. The only relevant question is: Whether or not others deserved the same punishment, whatever the economic or racial group, have avoided execution is irrelevant. It does not matter what race or economic status a person is, if he is guilty he must receive the appropriate punishment, which in some cases may be the death penalty. Capital punishment can be a difficult topic to approach because people tend to have extreme views on it.

The death penalty is an asset to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral. The arguments against the death penalty often do not hold up when examined more closely. It is important that the nation is united on this issue, rather than having some states use capital punishment while others do not.

The death penalty can be an extremely useful tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society. It is imperative that we begin to pass legislation making capital punishment legal throughout the United States so that justice can be served properly. The Case for Justice. Death Penalty Curricula for High School.

Death Penalty Information Center. This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 24th, at 5: Talk about why it's a controversial topic and present your thesis statement of what you want to discuss. This can be what you want to mention about the death penalty, or you can discuss the whole idea of it as a whole.

No matter what point you choose the cost to tax payers, the moral dilemma, etc to write about, though, you need to give facts to both sides of the topic. First discuss the positive side to your debate. Talk about why the death penalty is helpful, or talk about how it saves money to tax payers. Write at least one four to six sentence paragraph that has at least one source to cite your facts. Next discuss the bad side of your topic and also give as many facts as you do for the positives.

If you use more than one point for the pros, use the same amount for the cons. The two sides need to be fairly represented. The best way to support your side of things without outright saying what you believe you can conclude on your note. People will always remember your thesis and your conclusion, so end with your stance, but do not introduce any new information in the conclusion. This should solidify all the points you have made and leave the reader with a good understanding of what your paper was about.

When writing about any controversial topic you should try to stick to the facts and keep things fair on both sides. This type of outline will work with any topic that may be a bit touchy to present, but it is especially good for writing about the death penalty.

Writing about such topics can be difficult to do, but if you follow a basic outline you can write a decent paper about the death penalty without having to get too opinionated. We are proud of our seasoned crew of professional academic writers, editors and proofreads at http: Our main objective is to create an open, free and useful educational resource for college and graduate students.

The resources above offer extensive writing assistance for students around the world. Some of these websites are for free use, while others provide professional custom essay and term paper writing aid for a fee. We would like to announce that starting April 1, , our editorial team offers professional editing, proofreading and rewriting services for business and academic assignments.

You May Also Like

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Death Penalty Paper - Outline. Thesis: The death penalty is expensive, ineffective, and outdated. Introduction 1. Include Thesis 2. Introduce some points I. Opposing Arguments/Debunk 1. Include two opposing arguments 2. Debunk both arguments II. The DP violates human rights 1. Violates human rights 2. Violates Bill of Rights 3. Methods of execution III.

Privacy FAQs

Example Opening Claims for Death Penalty. Certain crimes require a o-strong="er punishment for deterrence and capital punishment is the ultimate deterrent. You cannot rehabilitate some people and .

About Our Ads

"Outline For Death Penalty" Essays and Research Papers Outline For Death Penalty Understanding the Death Penalty General Purpose: My general purpose is to give the audience a better understanding of . This paper will discuss a little bit of the history of how the death penalty came to be, how or if the death penalty deters people from committing murder, which states have abolished the death penalty and the opinion of a judge and a lawyer on the death penalty.

Cookie Info

Death Penalty Free Essay Samples & Outline Are you in High School, College, Masters, Bachelors or Ph.D and need someone to help in your homework? We offer quality research writing help, All our papers are original, 0% plagiarized & uniquely written by our dedicated Masters specialists. Research paper on death penalty outline The most interpersonal variable in the observed courtship was the, major under the open policy of and. Editorial Team only made some constituents to the death penalty, including the paper of a other outline.